Winning at the gate
June 27, 2002
BY MIKE KILEYSTAFF REPORTER
Let the attendance-poor White
Sox chew on this odd piece of Cubs gristle. Fans are pouring
through the turnstiles this season at Wrigley Field, and apparently
they will continue to do so through September 29, even though
the Cubs appear headed for their worst stretch of performances
in front of the home folks in more than 40 years.
So no matter what the Cubs
do this weekend at Comiskey Park, they are the real winners
in the battle for Chicago's hearts, minds and wallets. In
the world of business, what else is there than the almighty
dollar?
Not since 1956 to 1960, all
years in which Cubs teams fell short of 40 home victories,
have the boys of summer given their home fans less to cheer
about than in the last four seasons. With this Cubs club 16-22
at home, it would have to go 24-19 in the remaining 43 home
games to avoid falling short of 40 home wins for the third
time in the last four years.
Does this team look capable
of a winning record of any kind? The main difference from
1956-60, a stretch when no season had more than 979,904 show
up at Wrigley, is the present fans aren't turned off by the
bad baseball. The last three years have seen more than 2.7
million turn out every season, and this one will be no exception.
No wonder president/general
manager Andy MacPhail was in New York again Wednesday trying
to negotiate a new collective bargaining agreement with the
players union. Who would want the Wrigley Field gravy train
to be suspended for even a little while?
You can be bad, and the fans
will still come. What a deal.
Manager Jim Riggleman bowed
out in 1999 with a 34-47 home record, and 2.8 million came
to watch after 1998's playoff year. Riggleman's replacement,
manager Don Baylor, narrowly improved on that with a 38-43
mark in his Cubs debut year in 2000. Last year's 48-33 home
record was a welcome break in the trend, but only 16 home
victories so far bodes very ill for the final tally.
Maybe the Cubs can go back
to the college of coaches.
That's what happened in 1961,
after this string of bad showings at home: 39-38 in manager
Stan Hack's final year in 1956, followed by 31-46, 35-42 and
38-39 in manager Bob Scheffing's unproductive era. And, finally,
Charlie Grimm and Lou Boudreau were both managers in 1960,
when a 33-44 home record forced the decision that a college
of coaches would be a smart move.
Managing by committee also
got the Cubs nowhere for the next five years, but at least
they won 40 home games or more four times to give Cubs fans
some enjoyment.
And, of course, there were
even fewer home games back then.
While it's stating the obvious,
it's still amazing to think that there is no pressure on Cubs
management to consider making changes or improvements to the
club. Why should it when the club already is getting close
to the maximum for the minimum?
Bad baseball was a way of life
at Wrigley Field when fans weren't packing the joint. Now
that Wrigley is an in-place to meet and greet, bad baseball
is a way of life that can be too easily accepted by management.
Until someone can change the
entrenched philosophy that less is more, the Cubs will be
a joke to some--but their ideal is one that every marketing
student should be made to study in detail.
Just how can anyone make so
much money for giving the people what they don't want?